[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AMORE
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.dl.ac.uk/CCP/CCP4/main.html ***
> while the xtal structure of the wild type is already solved in
> spacegroup of p212121.
If you are working on a mutant then chances are that you have the same
P212121 crystal form as native. Are the unit cell paramaters close to
those of the wild type crystal? If so you can skip molecular replacement.
Just take the wild type structure as the starting model, run a few cycles
of rigid body refinement against your mutant data and make a difference
electron density map. Hopefully the mutation will be clearly visible in
the density.
If it does turn out to be a different orthorhombic crystal form then, as
suggested by others, do try to find out the systematic absences. One other
trick to do this is, if you used SCALA to scale your data, to look near
the end of its log file where it lists the I/SigI values along the h, k
and l axes. In my case it looks like:
h I sigI I/sigI
3 443. 80. 5.530
4 48836. 3793. 12.877
5 152. 86. 1.759
6 18208. 988. 18.428
7 172. 146. 1.184
8 118772. 6728. 17.654
9 2188. 270. 8.111 <<<
10 148297. 8439. 17.572
11 568. 340. 1.669
12 578948. 33628. 17.216
13 2149. 457. 4.698
14 102346. 6310. 16.221
15 1161. 553. 2.101
16 109650. 6638. 16.520
17 -151. 600. -0.252
18 108251. 6674. 16.221
19 1189. 651. 1.826
20 19826. 1431. 13.857
21 61. 581. 0.105
22 2770. 621. 4.459
23 857. 605. 1.417
You can see that all even reflections are strong and most odd ones are
weak. The one outlier h=9 is due to Kbeta radiation, but in general the
trend is clear and this is indeed a 2(1) screw axis.
Bart
- References:
- AMORE
- From: Qinghua Wang <qhw@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk>