[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ccp4bb]: Self rotation function interpretation
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Greetings all,
I was wondering if anyone could offer any suggestions in interpretting
the following self rotation function. My space group is P2(1) with
beta=91.8. I expect two molecules in the AU.
Running through CCP4i MOLREP, the output peak list looks like:
alpha beta gamma theta phi chi Rf Rf/sigma
Sol_RF 1 330.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.1278E+05 25.73
Sol_RF 2 180.00 4.28 0.00 177.86 0.00 180.00 0.1003E+05 20.21
Sol_RF 3 107.50 0.00 72.50 0.00 0.00 -180.00 5527. 11.13
Sol_RF 4 56.40 177.66 123.60 88.83 56.40 180.00 1263. 2.54
Sol_RF 5 326.02 177.07 211.48 88.54 -32.73 179.93 1262. 2.54
Sol_RF 6 31.49 177.07 146.01 88.53 32.74 179.94 1260. 2.54
Sol_RF 7 303.62 177.67 236.38 88.83 -56.38 180.00 1259. 2.53
Sol_RF 8 180.00 71.94 0.00 144.03 0.00 180.00 1245. 2.51
Sol_RF 9 230.82 85.12 50.82 124.53 0.00 110.36 1209. 2.43
Sol_RF 10 129.18 85.12 309.18 55.47 180.00 110.36 1209. 2.43
* Plotfile: molrep_rf.ps
My interpretation is that the first solution Sol_RF 1 is the origin and Sol_RF 2 is the
crystallographic
two-fold. This would suggest that Sol_RF 3 is the non-crystallographic 2-fold, but I can't make
sense of
the alpha,beta,gamma compared to the theta,phi,chi representations.
Running the self rotation function with AMORE gives the following peak list:
Best Solution: 359.999 0.000 0.000 100.000
SELF:: Self Rotation Function 1
ALPHA BETA GAMMA Omega Phi Kappa DC_X DC_Y DC_Z CC_P
SOLUTIONRS 360.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 999.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1.000 100.0
SOLUTIONRS 180.00 4.13 0.00 2.07 -180.00 180.00 -0.036 0.000 0.999 82.3
SOLUTIONRS 540.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 999.00 180.00 0.000 0.000 1.000 52.9
SOLUTIONRS 180.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 999.00 180.00 0.000 0.000 1.000 52.9
Again, I'm a little confused by some of the angles, (alpha=540? phi= 999?) and if the
first and second peaks are the origin and crystallographic 2-fold, this doesn't appear
to have found a non-crystallographic 2-fold.
The crystals diffract very well and one mol in AU would give a Vm of 4.24. This
suggests to me that I have two in AU.
Thanks,
Andy