[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ccp4bb]: A simple question of resolution
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***
Phil Evans wrote:
>
> Why use a cut off in refinement? This is unecessary and a Bad Thing to do
>
If one does not use a cut-off on F/SigF, why use a resolution cutoff?
There is nothing intrinsically objectionable about High Resolution Data,
the only reason I can see for excluding them is if they are weak (nonexistent).
Is it better to use a resolution cutoff which excludes a small number of
5-10 sigma reflections in the last shell while keeping 0.5 sigma reflections
at lower resolution, or a sigma cutoff which rejects weak reflections
wherever they occur?
(this just to elicit more discussion- I am a firm believer in a zero F/sigF
cutoff AND using resolution as far as truncate will allow). How to
report the resolution without misleading is then a problem. I would
favor Bart Haze's/Gerard Kleywegt's "effective resolution" based on the
number of reflections above some cutoff.
Ed