[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ccp4bb]: Conclusion of bulk solvent corrected fo-fc map

To: Mark DePristo <mdepristo@cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: Conclusion of bulk solvent corrected fo-fc map
From: <wgscott@chemistry.ucsc.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:44:39 -0800
Cc: ccp4bb@dl.ac.uk
In-Reply-To: <2BA28986-5599-11D7-9DC9-000393913572@cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk>
Sender: owner-ccp4bb@dl.ac.uk

***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***

Please let us know what weightings you are now using.


>  One definite conclusion (thanks to Ian Tickle) is that the default 
> B-factor restraints in refmac are definitely too tight (and incorrect 
> in the HTML documentation).  Loosening them up  ...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ccp4bb]: Conclusion of bulk solvent corrected fo-fc map
  - From: Mark DePristo <mdepristo@cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk>

References:
- [ccp4bb]: Conclusion of bulk solvent corrected fo-fc map
  - From: Mark DePristo <mdepristo@cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: [ccp4bb]: Conclusion of bulk solvent corrected fo-fc map
Next by Date: [ccp4bb]: refmac & idealize (u.k. : idealise)
Prev by thread: [ccp4bb]: Conclusion of bulk solvent corrected fo-fc map
Next by thread: Re: [ccp4bb]: Conclusion of bulk solvent corrected fo-fc map
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread