[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns

To: "Eleanor J. Dodson" <ccp4@ysbl.york.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
From: "David J. Schuller" <djs63@cornell.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:08:47 -0500 (EST)
cc: CCP4 bulletin board <CCP4BB@dl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3C4BDB78.CDB51A7B@ysbl.york.ac.uk>
Reply-To: "David J. Schuller" <djs63@cornell.edu>
Sender: owner-ccp4bb@dl.ac.uk

***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***

On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Eleanor J. Dodson wrote:

>  Can some-one comment on how valuable simulated annealing is at various
> resolutions?

since torsional MD became stylish i have been unable to make it run 
properly, since i didn't have whatever parameter file it wanted for haem. 
somehow i managed to survive without it.


=======================================================================
"Now that I'm a cranky, constipated old man I can afford to say that
 the younger generation of scientists makes me sick to my stomach."
                                                  - C.M. Kornbluth
=======================================================================
                        David J. Schuller
                        modern man in a post-modern world
                        MacCHESS, Cornell University
                        djs63@cornell.edu

References:
- Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
  - From: "Eleanor J. Dodson" <ccp4@ysbl.york.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: [ccp4bb]: Expression of archeal proteins
Next by Date: RE: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
Prev by thread: [ccp4bb]: Refmac input reflection file...
Next by thread: RE: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread