[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ccp4bb]: Bulk solvent model in REFMAC



***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***

Hello,

I have recently switched from CNS to using REFMAC for the final
refinement/analysis of several structures.  I have almost immediately
come across two interesting cases where the Babinet Bulk Solvent model
in REFMAC does some interesting things.   In the case of a high
resolution  dimer structure (1.9 A) , refined with 4 TLS domains the
freeR factor dropped so that is was lower than the working R.  Why would

this happen?  In the second case, a moderate resolution structure (2.7
A) with five-fold NCS was refined with one TLS domain per chain.  The
B-factors dropped and a large fraction of them were pinned at 2, when
the default Bbulk value of 200 was used.  I have tried varying the Bbulk

values to minimize the freeR, with the results below.  Note that the
test sets are the same in both CNS and REFMAC.  This has raised several
questions:


Q1.  Should the bulk solvent scale (ki) be interpreted to have a
physical meaning as suggested by Glykos & Kokkinidis (Acta Cryst. (200)
D56, 1070-72), where they say that ki and Bbulk are not independent and
Ki should be ~0.8 for most proteins?  In this case why is ki=0.001 when
the freeR is a minimum for the dimer structure?

Q2.  How can the free R refine to a value lower that the working R, when

its initial value is higher?

Q3.  In the case of the low resolution pentamer structure with 5-fold
NCS, is it reasonable to use such a low Bbulk?  The Ki for this case is
in closer agreement with that suggested by Glykos & Kokkinidis.
Certainly the refinements which result in many individual atomic
B-factors being pinned at 2.00 are not correct.  Note that normally
REFMAC does not permit the Bbulk value to be set below 70.


1.9A dimer
         Bbulk   Overall  Working    Free R     Mean B      Babinet's
scale
CNS        50.77          Rw=21.73   Rf=24.44   <B>=38.50   ki=0.340#
0813x60.   60  Ro=21.773  Rw=21.807  Rf=21.143  <B>=24.856  ki=0.169
0813x80.   80  Ro=21.694  Rw=21.729  Rf=21.040  <B>=21.860  ki=0.017
0813x100  100  Ro=21.695  Rw=21.731  Rf=21.028  <B>=21.461  ki=0.001
0813x120  120  Ro=21.702  Rw=21.740  Rf=20.999  <B>=21.019  ki=0.001<<
0813x150  150  Ro=21.741  Rw=21.780  Rf=21.002  <B>=20.637  ki=0.001
080515x   200  Ro=21.796  Rw=21.837  Rf=21.028  <B>=20.211  ki=0.001

2.7 A pentamer with five-fold NCS
         Bbulk  Overall    Working   Free R    Mean B   Ki    #B=2
CNS       34.75            R=22.08   Rf=24.32  <B>=47.5 0.359 #CNS
(ki=0.359)
080711x  200   Ro=23.322   R=23.232  Rf=25.000 <B>= 7.4 0.371 #(276)
0808125  125   Ro=23.174   R=23.086  Rf=24.795 <B>=11.3 0.465 #(25)
080616x  100   Ro=23.157   R=23.073  Rf=24.718 <B>=14.0 0.526 #(3)
080716x ~100.3 Ro=23.155   R=23.071  Rf=24.718 <B>=14.1 0.523 #(three
B=2)
0808090   90   Ro=23.155   R=23.071  Rf=24.694 <B>=15.5 0.555 #(one)
0808075   75   Ro=23.161   R=23.080  Rf=24.671 <B>=18.4 0.608 ###
081316    60   Ro=23.174   R=23.094  Rf=24.651 <B>=22.5 0.670 ###
081314    50   Ro=23.187   R=23.108  Rf=24.643 <B>=25.5 0.718 #<<
081310    40   Ro=23.203   R=23.125  Rf=24.644 <B>=29.0 0.769 ###



--

Best Regards,

Mark

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Mark A. White, Ph.D.                                    Tel:
Sealy Center for Structural Biology                     (409) 747-4747
Dept. of Human Biological Chemistry & Genetics          Fax:
Basic Science Building, Room 660C                       (409) 747-4745
University of Texas Medical Branch                      email:
Galveston, TX 77555-0647                mailto://white@xray.utmb.edu
http://xray.utmb.edu                    http://www.xray.utmb.edu/~white
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_