Re: [ccp4bb]: Re: (fwd)

[Anastassis Perrakis <perrakis@nki.nl>]

***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***

>  However, at very low temperature it is clear that a double conformation
> is static.

Really ? Is that so clear ? I thought that this is still debatable ?

I would agree that certainly at LT there is more static and less dynamic disorder than
at RT.

But how/why exclude dynamic disorder at liquid nitrogen temperature ?
Would that not depend in a considerable extent to the nature of the disorder, aka type
of side chain, hydrogen bonding pattern of each conformation, local environment in
general?

    A. (the same A. as quoted in the previous email from a private non-bb answer, but
I guess it's public debate now!)