You have to report the data You used for structure solution and refinement.
Since this is 'common' scientific ethic You don't need a reference.
Good luck
(:hristopher
Robert Lucas wrote:
*** For details on how to be removed from this list visit the ***
*** CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk ***Since this seems to be a ripe time for debates I figure I'll
throw my fuel onto the fire...My question is a simple one, how do you determine what resolution
to report your structure at?I'm not lucky enough enough to be in a situation with multiple complete
MAD datasets that were solved used an ingenious program while I was
drinking coffee. Instead I don't like coffee and my data is incomplete
and gets quite sparse at high resolution.I'm interested in what is a proper method for reporting resolution in
the worst/poor case scenarios, any references to papers on the topic
would also be greatly appreciated.Thanks,
Robert/) Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry (\
/ )University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3900( \
_( ( Phone: (949) 824-1933, FAX (949) 824-1954 ) )_
(((\ \ Email rlucas@uci.edu / /)))
(\\\\ \_/ / http://www.structure.uci.edu/~rlucas \ \_/ ////)
\ / \ /
\ _/ If you're not part of the solution, \_ /
/ / you're part of the precipitate. \ \***Dissertation Defense May 7th at 2PM in UCI's Tamkin F114***
-- Dr. Christopher Lehmann Center for Advanced fon: ++(301)-738-6126 Research in Biotechnology fax: ++(301)-738-6255 9600 Gudelsky Drive e-mail: lehmann@umbi.umd.edu Rockville, MD 20850, USA web: http://www.geocities.com/dr_christopher_lehmann/