[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns

To: ccp4bb@dl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
From: Jianghai Zhu <zhu5@purdue.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:05:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <3C483D58.2B2FB03@ysbl.york.ac.uk>
References: <Pine.SGI.3.96.1020118092535.30269C-100000@xray.umdnj.edu>
Sender: owner-ccp4bb@dl.ac.uk

***  For details on how to be removed from this list visit the  ***
***          CCP4 home page http://www.ccp4.ac.uk         ***

Hi,

I am very interested in this comparison too. Can anybody give me some 
details about the comparison between Refmac5 and CNS? I have never use 
Refmac5 before. Can refmac5 do simulated annealing?

Thanks.


================================
Jianghai Zhu
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
B203, Lilly Hall
Purdue University
Tel: 765-4949247 (O)
      765-4630228 (H)
================================

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
  - From: "Eleanor J. Dodson" <ccp4@ysbl.york.ac.uk>

References:
- [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
  - From: Mohamed Rafi <rafi@xray.umdnj.edu>
- Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
  - From: "Eleanor J. Dodson" <ccp4@ysbl.york.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: [ccp4bb]: dial box and crystal eyes for Linux?
Next by Date: Re: [ccp4bb]: dial box and crystal eyes for Linux?
Prev by thread: Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
Next by thread: Re: [ccp4bb]: Refmac vs. cns
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread